top of page

Offensive content or creative advertising?: Society takes a stand.  

Sunday, April 18 2021
Lauren Kingston

Marketing and advertising are a business’ development of promotional material in order to create interest from consumers in the market towards their brand and sell their product and/or service.  As this is a severely customer-driven industry, there is an extremely large focus on companies to create appropriate material, acting in line with current laws, values and ethics of consumers; ensuring media propaganda is relevant to modern society. However, although critical, this is not always ensured and businesses have failed to meet the standards and expectations of society, particularly through the creation of offensive content, featuring, discrimination, race, hate and stereotypes.

​

International fast-food chain KFC fell victim to claims of racial insensitivity in 2010, with their Australian Cricket Advertisement deemed as offensive content, that was aired as part of ‘KFC’s cricket survival guide’ series.  The commercial exhibits a calm white cricket fan, surrounded by ‘rowdy’ Caribbean West Indian supporters, offering out pieces of KFC chicken to appease the group so he could concentrate on the game. The character of the ad is heard saying, “Need a tip when you’re stuck in an awkward situation”, which is quickly followed by the remark, “Too easy” when the group settles after been given chicken. In addition to highlighting stereotypes of coloured individuals being uncivilised and barbarous, whilst their counterpart, the white man, is civil and refined; It also accentuated racist historical beliefs that ‘black people love chicken.’ As a result of publication, significant negative backlash ensued, and it was labelled extremely racist by 42% of society (KFC pulls cricket ad amid racism claims, 2010), whilst further complaints were made to advertising monitor, the Advertising Standards Bureau (ASD) (Complaints made to ASB against 'racist' KFC ad too little too late - Mumbrella, 2010).

logo-kfc.jpg

KFC is a leading fast-food brand that has a very large demographic in Australian society, with its influence carrying across cultures in a highly saturated market. Therefore, it’s important that we direct our concern to curbing the issue of discrimination and racial stereotyping portrayed in its media; and emphasise the urgency of brand advertising awareness within society. KFC’s poorly advised commercial was considered discriminatory by a significant portion of the population through a poll on the New York Daily Mail website, which was almost split, with 51 per cent of the population selecting "No, it's just light-hearted and fun" and 42 per cent indicating "Yes, it plays on stereotypes"; Six per cent voted "I'm not sure" (KFC pulls cricket ad amid racism claims, 2010). Consumers can successfully draw attention and concern to these issues by opposing discriminatory and offensive media content created by brands as promotional material, both through emphasizing their concerns online, an attribute of our digital society; and processing formal complaints through the Advertising Standards Bureau (ASD). This ability of society to comment on organisations’ advertising strategies aims to highlight the protracted issue of racist, discriminatory and offensive content in the advertising industry; and to affirm the need to employ socio-ethical educated individuals in these corporate advertising positions. Thus, brand advertising awareness is crucial in order to correctly hold societies morals and ethical positions as esteemed values; and to shape better industry perspectives, in which offensive content such as that created by KFC Australia, fails to fit.

KFCadvert_1554624c.jpg

The commercial drew heated debate between Australia and America, as it made its way across international waters. The controversy was picked up and largely reported on by US media sources including the New York Daily News and the Baltimore Sun. As a result, KFC Australia withdrew the ad from its promotional series and issued a statement regarding the backlash. Stating that, ‘the commercial was a “light-hearted reference to the West Indian cricket team” that had been "misinterpreted by a segment of people in the US"’ (Clark, 2010). The company also claimed, "The ad was reproduced online in the US without KFC's permission…where a culturally-based stereotype exists, leading to the incorrect assertion of racism” (Clark, 2010); and emphasised their direct opposition to all things discriminatory, indicating their full support of all diversified individuals of society.

 

KFC’s headquarters in America issued an apologetic statement addressing any offence caused by the commercia; however, this didn’t stop consumers being appalled and disturbed by KFC’s promotional decisions regarding the advertisement, and KFC were inundated on online forums and reporting organisations with their consumers’ distaste. Many stated the presence and extent of racist and discriminatory content in the advertisement and continued to mock the companies’ efforts and ignorance toward the issue. For example, one individual wrote to the Baltimore sun, "If it is a genuine KFC advertisement, it could be seen as racially insensitive", Jack Shepherd from BuzzFeed news continued to ask: "What's a white guy to do when he finds himself in a crowd full of black folks? KFC has the answer" (Clark, 2010). Another disgraced reader commented on the NY Daily News Website, stating, "This was blatantly racist" (KFC pulls cricket ad amid racism claims, 2010). The impact of KFC’s offensive content was experienced by consumers and the brand in both countries and was felt to have educated the company to take further care in its creation of promotional material as a direct consequence of societies reaction to its advertising strategy.

AANA-logo.gif

Marketing and advertising activities in Australia are governed by several legislative bodies that ensure societies needs and expectations are met in regards to appropriate promotional material in our current society. Each of these bodies enforce expectations of marketing and advertising strategies and reflect societies ethical positions towards them, including those of discrimination, racism and offensive content. This is seen through legislation or ethical codes which are crucial to the satisfaction of consumers in the market. For example, the Australian Federal Government created the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 which includes Section 16 broadly discussing discriminatory advertisements in a general sense, stating, “It is unlawful for a person to publish or display, or cause or permit to be published or displayed, an advertisement or notice that indicates, or could reasonably be understood as indicating, an intention to do an act that is unlawful by reason of a provision of this Part or an act that would…”  (Racial Discrimination Act 1975). In addition to this broad governing legislation, the main industry code of Advertising in Australia is the Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA), which is supported by the Advertising Standard Bureau (ASB). Section 2.1 of the AANA ethical code directly addresses discrimination and vilification in advertising, declaring, “Advertising or Marketing Communication shall not portray people or depict material in a way which discriminates against or vilifies a person or section of the community on account of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, age, sexual preference, religion, disability, mental illness or political belief” (AANA Code of Ethics, 2018). KFC’s cricket advertisement is in direct violation of AANA’s ethical industry code and breaches societies ethical standards regarding promotional material. As a result, consumers were deeply offended by the actions of KFC and ramifications of brand distrust and avoidance followed. Thus, the importance of industry codes and legislation surrounding marketing and advertising is highlighted to ensure expectations of both the brand and customer are met.

 

The implications of using offensive content as a brand marketing or advertising strategy can offer complicated results for business. Companies will largely receive negative feedback from consumers and can suffer significant detriments especially when creating content that is perceived by the market as racist and discriminatory. However, through the employment of controversial content the brand is able to achieve mass awareness of their product and organisation which may been viewed as a positive consequence to some industry professionals. Nonetheless, ultimately the company will likely be met with angry consumers that can severely impact business. This may be seen through, significant online backlash, damaged brand reputation and customer rapport, customer purchases and overall profits acutely decreasing, and in extreme cases, complete boycott of businesses and business activities. These risks can be detrimental to the function and success of an organisation and most brands will avoid the danger. In order to entirely avert the creation of offensive content, advertisers and marketing strategists need to consider the product and brand message and societies ethical expectations surrounding media and promotional material. This includes, deviating from concepts and ideas that although may be unintentionally offensive, can be perceived by consumers as such, with particular sensitivity to discrimination, race, hate and stereotypes. Therefore, it is crucial that industry professionals within marketing and advertising are conscious of potential consumer perceptions and have significant brand advertising awareness in order to create material that is appropriate and appealing to modern society and customer expectations, in order to avoid unnecessary implications to the business.

 

In conclusion, brands must create marketing and advertising material that coincides with societies values and ethical opinions regarding offensive content. In particular, discrimination, race, hate and stereotypes; in order to maintain a standard of media propaganda that is relevant to society and is safely mandated within industry codes and legislation. Ultimately, promoting positive brand-consumer interactions and ensuring the expectations of both organisations and customers in the market are met, through respect for diversity and business success.

Reference List

Aana.com.au. 2018. AANA Code of Ethics. [online] Available at: <http://aana.com.au/content/uploads/2018/07/AANA_Code-of-Ethics_July2018.pdf> [Accessed 11 April 2021].

 

Abc.net.au. 2010. KFC pulls cricket ad amid racism claims. [online] Available at: <https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-01-07/kfc-pulls-cricket-ad-amid-racism-claims/1201378> [Accessed 17 March 2021].

 

Clark, A., 2010. KFC accused of racism over Australian advertisement. [online] the Guardian. Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jan/06/kfc-advertisement-accused-of-racism> [Accessed 4 April 2021].

 

Clark, A., 2010. KFC scraps Australian advert after 'racist' allegations by US viewers. [online] the Guardian. Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jan/07/kfc-chicken-race-australia-america> [Accessed 11 April 2021].

 

GENDRE, L., HOARAU, A. and RICARD, V., 2018. Effective or offensive advertising?. [eBook] Sweden: Jönköping University. Available at: <https://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1214381/FULLTEXT01.pdf> [Accessed 4 April 2021].

 

Giles, D. and Whelan, J., 2009. Discrimination and Vilification in Advertising. [online] Sydney: Advertising Standards Bureau. Available at: <https://adstandards.com.au/sites/default/files/8736_researchreport_final_-_pdf.pdf> [Accessed 28 March 2021].

 

Koch, L., 2019. How Do Consumers Feel About Ads Placed Near Offensive Content?. [online] Insider Intelligence. Available at: <https://www.emarketer.com/content/does-bad-content-affect-consumer-perceptions-of-brand-safety> [Accessed 3 April 2021].

 

Mumbrella. 2010. Complaints made to ASB against 'racist' KFC ad too little too late - Mumbrella. [online] Available at: <https://mumbrella.com.au/complaints-made-to-asb-against-racist-kfc-ad-too-little-too-late-15193> [Accessed 13 April 2021].

 

Pash, C., 2020. The advertising industry and racial discrimination in Australia - AdNews. [online] Adnews.com.au. Available at: <https://www.adnews.com.au/news/the-advertising-industry-and-racial-discrimination-in-australia> [Accessed 8 April 2021].

 

Racial Discrimination Act 1975. Part II, 16.

 

Thesaurus.com. n.d. Thesaurus.com - The world's favorite online thesaurus!. [online] Available at: <https://www.thesaurus.com/> [Accessed 14 April 2021].

bottom of page